陰謀分析_デジタル監視01

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022
Government Bill
Originated in the House of Commons, Sessions 2019-21, 2021-22

Last updated: 14 July 2022 at 14:43

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 - Parliamentary Bills - UK Parliament

An Act to make provision about the police and other emergency workers; to make provision about collaboration between authorities to prevent and reduce serious violence; to make provision about offensive weapons homicide reviews; to make provision for new offences and for the modification of existing offences; to make provision about the powers of the police and other authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating or prosecuting crime or investigating other matters; to make provision about the maintenance of public order; to make provision about the removal, storage and disposal of vehicles; to make provision in connection with driving offences; to make provision about cautions; to make provision about bail and remand; to make provision about sentencing, detention, release, management and rehabilitation of offenders; to make provision about secure 16 to 19 Academies; to make provision for and in connection with procedures before courts and tribunals; and for connected purposes.　[28th April 2022]

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 (legislation.gov.uk)

陰謀分析_78事件02

既に予測逮捕への動きはUKで進んでいる

from Wikipedia

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022

Effects on public assembly
Part 3 of the Act gives police forces broad authority to place restrictions on protests and public assembly. Under previous UK legislation, police must show that a protest may cause "serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community" before imposing any restrictions.[13] Under this Act, police forces are allowed to place restrictions on protests they believe would otherwise constitute an existing offence of public nuisance, including imposing starting and finishing times and noise limits, and be able to consider actions by one individual as protests under provisions of the Act. Protestors disobeying such instructions from the police may be committing a criminal offence.[13][14]

Home Office minister Victoria Atkins said the bill updates the Public Order Act 1986 and drew a distinction between peaceful protest and "activities which inhibit the lives of people".[20] Robert Buckland, Secretary of State for Justice, said regarding the bill and protests: "We've got to think about the sometimes huge inconvenience caused to other people going about their lawful business."[21]

Response
The bill was controversial. It was welcomed by the Police Federation of England and Wales,[22] while the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners (APCC), a group of elected officials in England and Wales, registered their disagreement with the bill.

陰謀分析_ワク10

Vernon Coleman, Endgame, excerpts

Agenda 21
Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and a bunch of unelected billionaires and officials, politicians and policymakers around the world are determined on creating a global technocracy and introducing what they call the Great Reset or the Global Reset – a crude form of social engineering designed to manipulate and ‘own’ every citizen on earth. The world we know now, in 2021, is just a taste of what we can expect in the future.
The aim of those following Agenda 21 is to create their own version of a Utopia, a global technocracy with a guaranteed income for every citizen and a system of reward, punishment and control modelled on China’s social credit system. Global warming is the excuse. Once the Global Reset has been completed citizens will be monitored. Those who behave well will be rewarded. Those who fail to comply with the orders they are given will be punished and excluded from much of society. Agenda 21 is organised, legalised corruption.
The plan is to remove all signs of human dignity; with every piece of dignity disappearing too slowly for most people to notice. The people who have planned this coup rely on the mass of people being too busy, too distracted, too complacent, too lazy and too fearful to realise what is happening. And they know that they can ensure that those who speak up can be smeared, demonised and dismissed as right wing conspiracy theorists.
The result will be that individuals will be forced to submit to the tyranny of a technocratic state with so-called, self-appointed experts managing every aspect of human life. Our behaviour will be controlled in minute detail and we will be forced to be dependent on the State.
This is tyranny on a scale never known before, and the events of 2020 were planned to give governments an opportunity to force us to obey and become accustomed to a ‘new normal’ in which all individuality is suppressed and the power of the State (and its self- appointed functionaries) is everything.
The fact is that everything strange, bad, restricting and destructive that has happened in the last three decades is a result of Agenda 21.All of those things which happened, but which seemed wrong, inexplicable, damaging, unnatural and unreal, were a result of Agenda 21. Most of them occurred without even the slightest nod towards democracy since the crucial decisions were made by individuals working for the UN, the EU or the World Economic Forum, by huge, powerful Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) with staff on million dollar salaries, by quangos and by regional parliaments and so on – none of whom was staffed by individuals who had been elected.
Our lives have steadily deteriorated in every notable way. Health care, education, increased taxation (local and national), rapidly deteriorating services, reduced standard of living and increased corruption.
Campaigns demanding more rights for homosexuals and transgender individuals have created conflict, broken up the traditional family unit, done a great deal of permanent harm to religions and will have the acceptable by-product of helping to reduce the population. Doubters and those who object can easily be demonised as homophobic or transphobic.
Fear and confusion have been caused by deadly warnings and by constantly changing advice and impenetrable laws. None of this has been accidental. All trust and sense of fair play and decency have been eradicated. (Ironically, it is inevitable that the destruction of fair play and trust will lead many young people to become rebellious and to stand up against authoritarianism. But that is some way ahead and the rebellions will be quashed ruthlessly.)
Kindness and dignity are the main currencies of value in private life, and honesty, trust and honour are the only currencies of value in public life. Tragically, these qualities have, for years, been steadily devalued and in the last few months they have been shot, knifed, stamped on, kicked, spat on, shredded and attacked with brutal disregard for sense or sensibility. There is no grace, no serenity and no soul among our new leaders who have, without ever being elected to anything, clawed their way through life with their progress based on deceits built on avarice and jealousy. As a result, millions now consider themselves to be refugees in their own countries. Tony Blair (who is, in my view, quite possibly the most evil man in modernhistory), Gordon Brown and Boris Johnson are reported to have called for the creation of a global bureaucracy with more power than the World Health Organisation – all part of the end of sovereignty and nation states.
What happened in 2020 was merely the culmination of years of common purpose, quangos, civil servants, corporate insensitivity and local planning.
Nothing happened by accident.
Much of the rest of this book simply explains the full consequences of these plans, what the new normal will look like (unless we call a halt to it) – and how the United Nations plan will affect every aspect of our lives.

陰謀分析_ワク09

Vernon Coleman, End Game, excerpts

AIDS
Looking back I can see when I became a target and when commissions and media invitations suddenly dried up.
In 1988, I wrote a book called, The Health Scandal for a London publisher called Sidgwick and Jackson. They were incredibly excited about it. There was much talk of heavy promotion. At a special reception, the chairman of the company, Lord Rees Mogg told me how excited he was by the book.
But the book contained a small section questioning the Government’s line on AIDS. I produced evidence proving that the disease was not, as we had been told, going to affect every family in Britain by the year 2000. And suddenly, without explanation, The Health Scandal was abandoned. The planned publicity and advertising disappeared. And Sidgwick and Jackson refused to sell the paperback rights. The book had become too hot to handle. It seemed to me clear that my questioning of the AIDS myth was clearly embarrassing to the company. (I had previously written much along the same lines for the national newspaper to which I was contributing a weekly column.)
When my agent asked what had happened about arranging a paperback edition of the book, she was told that we could have the rights back since the company didn’t want to offer the book. Within less than a week we’d sold the book to a paperback house and since Sidgwick and Jackson didn’t want anything further to do with the book, I kept the entire paperback payment. Neither my agent nor I had ever come across anything like it. Publishers don’t usually turn up their noses at a chance to collect thousands of pounds in rights money.
I had exposed the AIDS fear as a lie. I produced figures which blew away the claim that we would all be affected by it. And suddenly, virtually overnight, I became a non-person. Regular appearances on television programmes were cancelled. Invitations to appear on BBC television and radio programmes ceased. I still wrote contracted newspaper columns but I had clearly been marked as dangerous. My books were only rarely reviewed in the UK. Requests to make keynote speeches stopped suddenly. As far asthe establishment was concerned I had become a nuisance and clearly had to be silenced.
After I exposed the way the AIDS ‘crisis’ had been exaggerated, I found that publishers around the world suddenly let my books go out of print or remaindered them – and refused to consider new titles. My German publishers had been selling fairly large amounts of my books (for example, one year I received a royalty cheque of around £30,000 for sales of How to Stop Your Doctor Killing You and Bodypower) but the books then disappeared, and the following year I received nothing in royalties. The publishers did not respond when I asked what had happened or when I sent them other titles. And I was banned in China (where my books had been bestsellers) after I wrote a column on a forbidden topic for a leading Chinese newspaper. Much the same sort of thing happened around the world.
Only now does it seem obvious that the AIDS virus was being promoted as the plague that would prepare us for Agenda 21. They massively increased the global mortality figures by, for example, including just about everyone who died of tuberculosis (among other common disorders).
I am not alone in thinking that AIDS was a rehearsal. I received a note from a reader who said: ‘I worked in several Genito-Urinary Medicine clinics between 1989-92 and then again between 1997- 2002. One of my duties in the latter post was reporting the monthly numbers to CDC Colindale. The Government used to manipulate those figures, the BBC and other mainstream media were happy to unquestioningly report them.’
There have, of course, been a number of other attempts to find a scary story with which to terrify the world: avian flu and swine flu, to name but two.
And what did these threats have in common?
They were all subject to dramatically exaggerated forecasts from Professor Neil Ferguson at Imperial College, London – the one with links to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and a man who seems to me to be so incompetent that if he designed a cup he’d put the handle on the inside.

陰謀分析_ワク08

EustaceMullins, Murder by Injection

VACCINATION
One of the few doctors who has dared to speak out against the Medical Monopoly, Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, dramatized his stand against Modern Medicine by defining it as a Church which has Four Holy Waters. The first of these, he listed as Vaccination. Dr. Mendelsohn termed vaccination "of questionable safety." However, other doctors have been more explicit. It is notable that the Rockefeller interests have fought throughout the nineteenth century to make these Four Holy Waters compulsory throughout the United States, ignoring all the protests and warnings of their dangers.
Of  these  four  items,  which  might  well  be  termed  the  Four  Horsemen  of  the Apocalypse, because they too are known to bring death and destruction in their wake, the most pernicious in its long term effects may well be the practice of immunization. This practice goes directly against the discovery of modem holistic medical experts that the body has a natural immune defense against illness. The Church of Modem Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the term, "immunization." The greatest heresy any physician can commit is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four  Holy  Waters,  but  the  most  deeply  entrenched  in  modern  medical  practice  is undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly. Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated,
"My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future."
The present writer well remembers the 1920s, as a child in Virginia, going to school for some weeks without having submitted to the compulsory vaccination ordered by the state authorities. Each morning, the teacher would begin the day's classes by asking, "Clarence, did you bring your vaccination certificate today?" Obviously, this was the most urgent business of the educational system, taking priority over such matters as lessons and studying. Each morning, I would have to reply, "No, I didn't bring it today." The other 
Page62children would turn and stare at this dangerous classmate, who might infect them all with some terrible disease.
My mother had been a registered nurse, and she never urged me to go ahead with my vaccination. I suspect she knew more than the doctors about its possible effects. After postponing the dreaded ordeal for some weeks, I was finally led to the doctor like an animal being led up the plank to be stunned, and I received my injection. Of course it made me extremely ill, as my body fought the infection, but the class was delivered from peril, and I was accepted as a duly branded member of society. In "The Curse of Canaan," I wrote of the deliverance of our children up for ritual sacrifice, a practice which seemingly ended with the destruction of the Baal cult some five thousand years ago. Unfortunately, the Cult of Baal seems to be firmly entrenched in the present Establishment, which is often known  by  the  sobriquet,  the  Brotherhood  of  Death.  It  is  disturbing  to  see  how  the educationists eagerly embrace each new offense against children in our schools, railing against any mention of morality or religion, while solemnly indoctrinating six year olds in 
the advantages of "an alternative life style" in their sexual preferences. The present goal of 
the National Education Association seems to be that teachers should hand out condoms to 
the class before beginning each day's activities.
The urgency of my vaccination was not that there was any epidemic then raging in the city of Roanoke, nor has there been one in the ensuing sixty years. The urgency was that no child shall be spared the ministrations of the Cult of Baal, or forego sacrifice on the altar of the child molesters. The Medical Monopoly cannot afford to have a single pupil escape the monetary offering to be paid for the compulsory vaccination, the tribute of the enslaved to their masters.
From  London  comes  an  alarming  observation  from  a  practitioner  of  excellent reputation and long experience. Dr. Herbert Snow, senior surgeon at the Cancer Hospital of London, voiced his concern,
"In recent years many men and women in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly, often after attending a feast or a banquet. I am convinced that some eighty per cent of these deaths are caused by the inoculation or vaccination they have undergone. They are well known to cause grave and permanent disease to the heart. The coroner always hushes it up as 'natural causes.' "
You cannot find any such warning in any medical textbook or popular book on health. In fact, this writer was able to locate it in a small volume buried deep in the stacks of the Library  of  Congress.  Yet  such  an  ominous  observation  from  an  established  medical practitioner should be as widely circulated as possible, if only to be attached by those who can refute its premise. At least it cannot be attacked by the Establishment as quackery, because Dr. Snow is not attempting to sell some substitute for vaccination, but merely warning of its dangers.
Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana, finds that
"Cancer  was  practically  unknown  until  compulsory  vaccination  with  cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person."
At last, we have the breakthrough for which the American Cancer Society has been searching, at such great expense, and for so many years. Dr. Clarke has never seen a 
Page63case of cancer in an unvaccinated person. Is not this a lead which should be explored? With such an impetus, the ACS could once again get the telephone banks ringing in the fund-raising drives, to initiate positive research as to the possible connection between vaccination and the incidence of cancer. Somehow, we suspect that ACS will not follow this lead. It would also look well etched in stone above the imposing entrance to the Memorial  Sloan  Kettering  Cancer  Center,  "I  never  saw  a  case  of  cancer  in  an unvaccinated person." However, it is unlikely that the High Priests of Modern Medicine will be able to give up one of the Four Commandments. It will be necessary for an outraged public to bring pressure to bear to abandon the modern ritual of sacrificing our children to Baal  in  a  five  thousand  year  old  ritual  called,  in  its  modern  version,  "compulsory immunization."
In the land where freedom rings, or is supposed to ring, it is even more surprising to find that every citizen is compelled to submit to a compulsory vaccination ritual. Here again, we are speaking of a civilization which is now being visited by two plagues, the plague of cancer and the plague of AIDS, yet compulsory vaccination offers no protection against the plagues which threaten us. It is goodbye whooping cough, goodbye diphtheria and  hello  AIDS.  The  Medical  Monopoly  is  searching  desperately  for  some  type  of "immunization" against these plagues, and no doubt will eventually come up with some type of "vaccine" which will be more dreadful than the disease. From the outset, our most distinguished medical experts have proudly informed us that AIDS is incurable, which is hardly the approach we expect from those who demand that we accept their infallibility in all things to do with medicine.
Another well-known medical practitioner, Dr. J. M. Peebles of San Francisco, has written a book on vaccine, in which he says,
"The vaccination practice, pushed to the front on all occasions by the medical profession through political connivance made compulsory by the state, has not only become  the  chief  menace  and  the  greatest  danger  to  the  health  of  the  rising generation, but likewise the crowning outrage upon the personal liberties of the American citizen; compulsory vaccination, poisoning the crimson currents of the human system with brute-extracted lymph under the strange infatuation that it would prevent smallpox, was one of the darkest blots that disfigured the last century."
Dr. Peebles refers to the fact that cowpox vaccine was one of the more peculiar "inventions or discoveries of the Age of Enlightenment." However, as I have pointed out in "The Curse of Canaan," the Age of Enlightenment was merely the latest program of the Cult of Baal and its rituals of child sacrifice, which, in one guise or another, has now been with us for some five thousand years. Because of this goal, the Medical Monopoly is also known as "The Society for Crippling Children."
Perhaps the most telling comment of Dr. Peebles' criticism is his reference to "brute- extracted lymph." Could there be some connection between the injection of this substance and the spread of a hitherto unknown form of cancer, cancer of the lymph glands?
This type of cancer is not only one of the most commonly encountered versions of this disease; it is also one of the most difficult to treat, because it rapidly spreads throughout the entire system. A diagnosis of cancer of the lymph glands now means a virtual death sentence.
Page64If we suppose that physicians such as Dr. Snow and Dr. Peebles are trumpeting nonexistent dangers when they write of vaccination, we have only to look at the court records of many cases around the country. Wyeth Laboratories was the defendant in a case in which a Wichita Kansas jury recently awarded $15 million in damages to an eight year old girl. She incurred permanent brain damage after receiving a diphtheria-pertussis- tetanus vaccine. Michelle Graham received the immunization at the age of three months, and incurred severe brain damage which left her permanently incapacitated. Her lawyers proved that the damage was solely attributable to the vaccine, although Wyeth's lawyers attempted to deny this.
Because of the financial prospects, physicians are demanding earlier vaccination for children each year. The Vaccination Committee of the American Academy of Pediatricians recently demanded that the age for children to receive flu vaccine be lowered from the previous twenty-four months to eighteen months. They are promoting a new version of flu vaccine which was said to have been tested on children in Finland.
In an article in Science, March 4, 1977, Jonas and Darrell Salk warn that,
"Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent . . . the live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage)."
If vaccines present such a clear and present danger to children who are forced to submit to them, we must examine the forces which demand that they submit. In the United States, vaccines are actively and incessantly promoted as the solution for all infectious diseases by such government agencies as the Center for Disease Control in Georgia, by HEW, USPHS, FDA, AMA and WHO. It is of more than passing interest that the federal agencies should be such passionate supporters of compulsory use of vaccines, and that they also should go through the "revolving door" to the big drug firms whose products they have so assiduously promoted, throughout their years of service to the public. It is these federal  agents  who  have  drafted  the  procedures  which  forced  the  states  to  enact compulsory vaccination legislation which had been drafted by the attorneys for the Medical Monopoly,  to  become  "the  law  of  the  land."  In  the  dim  reaches  of  the  past,  when Americans were more protective of their now-vanishing freedoms, there was sporadic opposition to the threatened outrage which a dictatorial central government sought to impose on every child in the United States. In 1909, the Senate of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts introduced Bill No. 8;
"An Act To Prohibit Compulsory Vaccine. Sec. 1. It shall be unlawful for any board of education, board of health, or any public board acting in this state, under political regulations or otherwise, to compel by resolution, order or proceedings of any kind, the vaccination of any child or person of any age, by making vaccination a condition precedent to the attending of any public or private school, either as pupil or teacher."
No doubt this legislation was drafted by a physician who was well aware of the dangers of vaccination. Even in 1909, the Medical Monopoly was strong enough to bury this bill. It was never submitted for vote. However, the peril of even one state legislature foiling  their  criminal  conspiracy  caused  the  Rockefeller  Syndicate  to  concentrate  on perfecting an instrument for controlling each and every state legislature in these United States. This was achieved by setting up the Council of State Governments in Chicago. Its 
Page65ukases are routinely issued to every state legislator, and such is its totalitarian control that not one legislature has ever failed to follow its dictates.
Edward  Jenner  (1796-1839)  "discovered"  that  cowpox  vaccine  would  supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth century scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the century, due to a number of contributing factors. After the use of cowpox vaccine became  widespread  in  England,  a  smallpox  epidemic  broke  out  which  killed  22,081 people. The smallpox epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In 1872, 44,480 people were killed by it. England finally banned the vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely heralded "contributions" which that country had made to modem medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its dangers were hurried off to jail.
Japan initiated compulsory vaccine in 1872. In 1892, there were 165,774 cases of smallpox  there, which  resulted  in  29,979  deaths.  Japan  still  enforces  compulsory vaccination; however, since it is a militarily occupied nation, its present government can hardly be blamed for submitting to  the Rockefeller  Medical  Monopoly.  Germany  also instituted compulsory vaccination. In 1939 (this during the Nazi regime), the diphtheria rate increased astronomically to 150,000 cases. Norway, which never instituted compulsory vaccination, had only fifty cases during the same period. Polio has increased 700% in states which have compulsory vaccination. The much quoted writer on medical problems, Morris Beale, who for years edited his informative publication, Capsule News Digest, from Capitol Hill, offered a standing reward during the years from 1954 to 1960 of $30,000, which he would pay to anyone who could prove that the polio vaccine was not a killer and a fraud. There were no takers.
Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu "epidemic" of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called "the Spanish Influenza," a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called "the Russian Flu." For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.
The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk magazine notes that
"During the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was high."
In what is now known as "the Great Swine Flu Massacre," the President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the major drug manufacturers. They had a "swine flu" vaccine which suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other 
Page66market, humans. The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine came directly from the Disease  Control  Center  in  Atlanta,  Georgia.  Perhaps  coincidentally,  Jimmy  Carter,  a member of the Trilateral Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter offered no serious threat in the election. Suddenly, out of Atlanta, came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national immunization campaign against "swine flu." The fact that there was not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs, which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one bright young man remarked, "Well, if the swine breeders won't inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into people."
The  Ford  sponsored  swine  flu  campaign  almost  died  an  early  death,  when  a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris, formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at the Food and Ding Administration, declared that there could be no authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public with his statement that "at no point were the swine flu vaccines effective." He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done. The damage control consisted of that great humanitarian, Walter Cronkite, and the President of the United States, combining their forces to come to the rescue of the Medical Monopoly. Walter Cronkite had President Ford appear on his news program to urge the American people to submit to the inoculation with the swine flu vaccine. CBS then or later could never find any reason to air any analysis or scientific critique of the swine flu vaccine, which was identified as containing many toxic poisons, including alien viral protein particles,  formaldehyde,  residues  of  chicken  and  egg  embryo  substances,  sucrose, theimorosal  (a  derivative  of  poisonous  mercury),  polysorbate  and  some  eighty  other substances.
Meanwhile,  back  at  the  virus  laboratories,  after  Dr.  Anthony  Morris  has  been summarily fired, a special team of workers was rushed in to clean out the four rooms in which he had conducted his scientific tests. The laboratory was filled with animals whose records verified his claims, representing some three years of constant research. All of the animals were immediately destroyed, and Morris' records were burned. They did not go so far as to sow salt throughout the area, because they believed their job was done.
On April 15, 1976, Congress passed Public Law 94-266, which provided $135 million of taxpayers' funds to pay for a national swine flu inoculation campaign. HEW was to distribute the vaccine to state and local health agencies on a national basis for inoculation, at no charge. Insurance agencies then went public with their warning that they would not insure drug firms against possible suits from the results of swine flu inoculation, because no studies had been carried out which could predict its effects. It was to foil the insurance companies  that  CBS  had  Gerald  Ford  make  his  impassioned  appeal  to  215,000,000 Americans to save themselves while there was still time, and to rush down to the friendly local health department and get the swine flu vaccination, at absolutely no charge. This may have been CBS' finest hour in its distinguished career of "public service."
Hardly had the swine flu campaign been completed than the reports of the casualties began to pour in. Within a few months, claims totalling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had suffered paralysis from the swine flu vaccine. The medical authorities proved 
Page67equal to the challenge; they leaped to the defense of the Medical Monopoly by labeling the new epidemic, "Guillain-Barre Syndrome." There have since been increasing speculations that  the  ensuing  epidemic  of  AIDS  which  began  shortly  after  Gerald  Ford's  public assurances,  was  merely  a  viral  variation  of  the  swine  flu  vaccine.  And  what  of  the perpetrator of the Great Swine Flu  Massacre, President Gerald Ford?  As the logical person to blame for the catastrophe, Ford had to endure a torrent of public criticism, which quite naturally resulted in his defeat for election (he had previously been appointed when the agents of the international drug operations had ushered Richard Nixon out of office). The  unknown  Jimmy  Carter,  familiar  only  to  the  super-secret  fellow  members  in  the Trilateral Commission, was swept into office by the outpouring of rage against Gerald Ford. Carter proved to be almost as serious a national disaster as the swine flu epidemic, while Gerald Ford was retired from politics to life. Not only did he lose the election; he was also sentenced to spend his remaining years trudging wearily up and down the hot sandy stretches of the Palm Springs Golf course.
At the annual ACS Science Writers Seminar, Dr. Robert W. Simpson, of Rutgers University, warned that:
"Immunization programs against flu, measles, mumps and polio may actually be seeding humans with RNA to form proviruses which will then become latent cells throughout the body . . . they can then become activated as a variety of diseases including lupus, cancer, rheumatism and arthritis."
This was a remarkable verification of the earlier warning delivered by Dr. Herbert Snow of London more than fifty years earlier. He had observed that the long-term effects of the vaccine, lodging in the heart or other parts of the body, would eventually result in fatal damage to the heart. The vaccine becomes a time bomb in the system, festering as what are known as "slow viruses," which may take ten to thirty years to become virulent. When that time arrives, the victim is felled by a fatal onslaught, often with no prior warning, whether  it  is  a  heart  attack  or  some  other  disease.  Health  Freedom  News,  in  its July/August  1986 issue, noted that  "Vaccine is linked to brain  damage. 150 lawsuits pending against DPT vaccine manufacturers, seeking $1.5 billion damages."
When  the  present  writer  was  a  teenager  in  Virginia,  each  summer  became  a nightmare for anxious parents, as epidemics of poliomyelitis, generally called infantile paralysis, swept the nation. Throughout the summer, we imbibed bottle after bottle of ice cold soda pop to wash down our afternoon snacks of candy bars, with no inkling that we were preparing our systems for the breeding of the polio virus. The most famous victim of polio was the Governor of New York, Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1931, during the annual polio epidemic, Roosevelt officially endorsed a so-called "immune serum," a precursor of the polio vaccines of the 1950s. It was sponsored by Dr. Lindsly R. Williams, the son-in- law of the managing partner of the investment bankers, Kidder Peabody. The Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations had urged the building of a new medical edifice to be called the New York Academy of Medicine. As was often the case, they did not provide the funds, but planned the staging campaign whereby the public was induced to contribute millions of dollars for it. Dr. Williams was then appointed director of this Academy, despite the fact that his medical abilities were a joke in New York. Williams used this post to become the apostle of socialized medicine in the United States, a goal which the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly ardently desired, and which was finally achieved when the Medicare program was adopted many years later. In reality, as Dr. Emanuel Josephson pointed out, Williams 
Page68stood  for  the  political  and  commercial  domination  of  the  medical  profession  under  a socialized system.
Roosevelt then announced his candidacy for the Presidency of the United States, a post for which he seemed physically disqualified. Because of his handicap, he had been unable to stand or walk for many years. He conducted his business from a wheelchair. It seemed incredible that he would be able to wage a national campaign for the office of president. To allay these doubts, Dr. Williams wrote an article which was published in Collier's magazine, the second largest magazine in the United States at that time. In this article, Dr. Williams certified that Governor Franklin D.  Roosevelt was  physically  and mentally fit to be President of the United States. It was then bruited about that a new Cabinet post, Secretary of Health, was to be created especially for Dr. Williams in an upcoming Roosevelt Administration.
The "immune serum" against polio was known to be dangerous and worthless when Roosevelt endorsed it. The National Health Institute of the U.S. Public Health Service had experimented with monkeys for three years, using this identical serum. The Institute stated that a study of the serum had been made on the recommendation of Dr. Simon Flexner, the head of the Institute. The serum was then used, and many children died from it. The New York State Commissioner of Health, Dr. Thomas Parran (who was later appointed Surgeon  General  of  the  United  States),  who  owed  his  appointment  to  Dr.  Williams' recommendation to Governor Roosevelt, refused to hold hearings to validate the serum, while  Roosevelt  continued  to  reap  the  rewards  of  "charity"  from  his  Warm  Springs Foundation and his annual birthday balls celebrating the polio epidemic.
In  1948,  a  Dr.  Sandier,  who  was  then  serving  as  nutritional  expert  at  the  U.S. Veterans  Administration  Hospital  in  Oteen,  North  Carolina,  became  alarmed  at  the enormous amounts of heavily sugared drinks, candy and other sweets which were being consumed by children during the hot summer months, at the same time that the polio became epidemic each year. He conducted tests which led him to the conclusion that the children's  consumption  of  sugar  had  a  direct  relation  to  the  virulence  of  the  polio outbreaks. He then issued an urgent warning to parents to ban consumption of any refined sugar product, particularly candy, soft drinks and ice cream during the summer months. The result of Dr. Sandler's campaign was that the number of polio cases dropped in North Carolina 90% in a single year, from 2,498 in 1948 to only 229 in 1949. Aroused by the effect that Dr. Sandler's  warning campaign had  had on their summer  sales  in  North Carolina, the soft drink distributors and the candy manufacturers came in the following year with a statewide promotional campaign, featuring free samples and other promotions. By 1950, the polio toll had risen once more to its 1948 level. What happened to Dr. Sandier? A study of North Carolina publications shows no further mention of him or his program.
Herbert M. Shelton wrote in 1938 in his book, "Exploitation of Human Suffering," that "Vaccine  is  pus—either  septic  or  inert—if  inert  it  will  not  take—if  septic  it  produces infection."  This  explains  why  some  children  have  to  go  back  and  receive  a  second inoculation, because the first one did not "take"—it was not sufficiently poisonous, and did not infect the body. Shelton says that the inoculations cause sleeping sickness, infantile paralysis, haemoplagia or tetanus.
The Surgeon General of the United States, Leonard Scheele, pointed out to the annual AMA convention in 1955 that "No batch of vaccine can be proven safe before it is 
Page69given to children." James R. Shannon of the National Institute of Health declared that "The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used."
With the advent of Dr. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine in the 1950s American parents were assured that the problem had been solved, and that their children were now safe. The ensuing suits against the drug manufacturers received little publicity. "David v. Wyeth Labs," a suit involving Type 3 Sabin Polio Vaccine, was judged in favor of the plaintiff, David. A suit against Lederle Lab involving Orimune Vaccine was settled in 1962 for $10,000. In two cases involving Parke-Davis' Quadrigen, the product was found to be defective. In 1962, Parke-Davis halted all production of Quadrigen. The medical loner, Dr. William Koch, declared that "The injection of any serum, vaccine, or even penicillin has shown a very marked increase in the incidence of polio, at least by 400%."
The Center for Disease Control stayed out of sight for some time after the Great Swine Liu Massacre, only to emerge more stridently than ever with a new national scare program on the dangers of another plague, which was named "Legionnaires'
Disease" after an outbreak at the Bellevue Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia. Apparently this virus multiplied in the air conditioning and heating systems of some older hotels in large cities, probably because the vents were never cleaned. In a few isolated instances, it caused death to those who were afflicted. For some reason, these victims were usually elderly Legionnaires, who had attended a gathering at one of these hotels. As the older hotels were gradually replaced by new, more modem motels, Legionnaires Disease quietly faded away, without the Disease Control Center being able to bring off another $135 million coup for the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly.
Polio vaccination has now been accepted as a fact of life by the American public, which derives considerable comfort from the gradual disappearance of the annual scare campaign at the beginning of each summer. . . However, the Washington Post of January 26, 1988 featured a story which created some puzzling afterthoughts. It was announced at a national conference held in Washington that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine. We quote,
"In fact, all the cases in America come from the vaccine. The naturally occurring (or wild type) polio virus has not been shown to cause a single case of polio in the United States since 1979."
It was to confront this unpleasant fact that the Institute of Medicine, under contract to the U.S. Public Health Service, had convened a committee in Washington to review the current use of polio vaccine. You thought they would vote to discontinue it, perhaps? This would be a logical conclusion. Unfortunately, logic plays no part in such deliberations. The Post reported that "No radical change is expected. 'The status quo is very appealing,'" said conference chairman Dr. Frederick Robbins, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland.
This story raises more questions than it answers. It also reveals the wide gap between the medical mind and that of the layman. A layman would say, "If all cases of polio in the United States since 1979 have been caused by the polio vaccine, isn't this a good reason for  discontinuing?"  Such  reasoning  is  always  called  "simplistic"  by  our  overeducated professionals.  After  all,  one  has  to  think  of  the  national  economy,  and  of  drug manufacturers geared up to the continuous production of a vaccine for an epidemic which has disappeared. Think of the unemployment, and the diminution of dividends to the 
Page70holders of stock in the Drag Trust. After all, most of their income is donated to "charity." If you cannot see the logic of this reasoning, you will never get a job with the U.S. Public Health Service.

陰謀分析_ワク07

モンタニエ氏の論文抜粋

COVID-19, SARS and Bats  Coronaviruses Genomes Unexpected Exogenous RNA Sequences

We are facing the worldwide invasion of a new coronavirus. This follows several limited outbreaks of related viruses in various locations in a recent past (SARS, MERS). Although the main objective of researchers is to bring  efficient  therapeutic  and  preventive  solutions  to  the  global  population,  we  need   also  to  better understand the origin of the newly coronavirus-induced epidemic in order to avoid future outbreaks. The present molecular appraisal is to study by a bio-infomatic approach the facts relating to the virus and its precursors. 
This article shows how 16 fragments (Env Pol and Integrase genes) from different strains, both diversified and very recent, of the HIV1, HIV2 and SIV retroviruses most likely are present into the genome of COVID- 19. Among these fragments, 12 are concentrated in a very small region of the COVID-19 genome, length less than 900bases, i.e. less than 3% of the total length of this genome. In addition, these footprints are positioned in 2 functional genes of COVID-19: the orf1ab and S spike genes.
 To sum up, here are the two main facts which contribute to our hypothesis of a partially synthetic genome: A contiguous region representing 2.49% of the whole COVID-19 genome of which 40.99% is made up of 12 diverse fragments originating from various strains of HIV SIV retroviruses. On the other hand, these 12 fragments some  of which appear concatenated. 
Notably, the retroviral part of these regions, which consists of 8 elements from various strains HIV1, HIV2 and SIV covers a length of 275 contiguous bases of COVID-19. The cumulative length of these 8 HIV SIV elements represents 200 bases. Consequently, the HIV SIV density rate of this region of COVID-19 is 200/275 = 72.73%, which is considerable s made of. Moreover each of these elements is made of 18 or more nucleotides and therefore may have function. They are called Exogenous Informative Elements. 
A major part of these 16 EIE already existed in the first SARS genomes as early as 2003. However, we demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV1 HIV2 Exogenous Informative Elements radically distinguishes all COVID-19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains. 
We then gather facts about the possible origins of COVID_19. We have particularly analyzed this small region of 225 bases  common to COVID_19 and batRaTG13 but totally absent in all SARS strains. 
Then, we discuss the case of bat genomes presumed to be at the origin of COVID_19. In the strain of bat RaTG13 coronavirus isolated in 2013, then sequenced in 2020, the homology profile for HIV1 Kenya 2008 fragment is identical to that of COVID_19. 
Finally, we have studied the most recent genetic evolution of the COVID_19 strains involved in the world epidemic. We found a significant occurrence of mutations and deletions in the 225b region.
On sampling genomes, we finally show that this 225b key region of each genome, rich in EIE, evolves much faster than the corresponding whole genome.
The   comparative   analysis   of   the   SPIKES   genes   of   COVID_19   and   Bat   RaTG13 demonstrates two abnormal facts: on the one hand, the insertion of 4 contiguous amino acids in the middle of SPIKE, on the other hand, an abnormal distribution of synonymous codons in the second half of SPIKE. Finally the insertion in this region of an EIE coming from a Plasmodium Yoelii gene is demonstrated, but above all seems to explain the "strategy" pursued by having "artificially" modified the ratio of synonym codons / non-synonymous codons in this same region of 1770 COVID_19 SPIKE nucleotides.

陰謀分析_ワク06

グラフェン疑惑に関する報告書　抜粋

Case_Briefing_Document_and_lab_report_Ref_AUC_101_Report

Corporate Manslaughter

Gross Criminal Manslaughter
Immediate action required:
Halt the roll-out of experimental treatments known as “COVID-19 Vaccines” immediately pending Police forensic examination

Background Statement
The British Government began a rollout of what is now referred to as “COVID-19 vaccines” in early 2021. The said ‘vaccines’ received a temporary Emergency Authorisation under Regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations Act (2012).
All Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials are ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022/early 2023. The treatments are currently experimental with only 1 year of short-term data and no long-term human safety data available. It is widely accepted now that none of the COVID-19 experimental treatments prohibit infection of COVID-19 nor are they prohibiting transmission of any disease.
Scientists around the world have been reporting unusual findings when examining COVID-19 injection vial contents in an effort to ascertain what is causing reported deaths, injuries and adverse reactions.
On 20th September 2021 in the pathological institute in Reutlingen, Germany, the results of autopsies of eight people who died after COVID19 experimental treatment were presented. The fine tissue analyses were performed by pathologists Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter Lang. The findings confirm the previous report from Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher. Of more than 40 corpses he autopsied, who had died within two weeks of COVID19 experimental treatment, approximately one-third of those deaths were caused by the experimental treatment itself.

In November 2020 Dr Andreas Noack, a German chemist and one of the EU’s top graphene experts, released a video explaining that he had discovered graphene hydroxide contained in the COVID-19 experimental treatments. He described how the graphene hydroxide nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of recipients and how they would not show up on an autopsy or normal toxicology tests given their atomic size.
On 26th November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about graphene hydroxide, he died in suspicious circumstances.
Professor Dr Pablo Campra, University of Almeria, Spain also examined Covid-19 experimental treatments in November 2021 using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. He too confirmed the presence of graphene.

Post Vaccination Death & Injury Reports
It is possible to signpost you to numerous death and injury reports made by way of statements to Police and Lawyers around the UK.
It is incumbent upon medical staff in the UK to report any injury, adverse reaction or death following the injection of these experimental treatments. The MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) set up the Yellow Card System for this purpose and encourages the reporting of COVID-19 suspected side effects to medicines and vaccines or medical devices and diagnostic adverse incidents used in coronavirus treatment.
As of 5th January 2022, this system shows that death has been listed as an outcome related to COVID-19 experimental treatments at least 1,932 times as well as nearly one and a half million adverse reactions to the experimental treatments (1,414,293).
In the United States, VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) reports of Deaths have been listed as an outcome related to COVID-19 experimental treatments at least 21,745 times as of January 7, 2022 and 38,000 people are permanently disabled.
On the Euro eudraVigilance European database Death has been listed as an outcome related to COVID-19 experimental treatments at least 34,337 times as of December 18, 2021. 3.1 Million injuries have also been reported.
It follows that the rates of increase of death and significant harm are increasing as the experimental treatment programme is rolled out.

Investigation
Following her own experience with patients who had suffered apparent vaccine injury and adverse reactions, a British Medical Practitioner came forward in December 2021 offering to assist in an investigation to ascertain whether the results discovered by Dr’s Noack and Campra could be replicated in the UK and also to examine the COVID-19 injection vials for discovery of toxins or unexpected contents.
The medical practitioner seized an injection vial from the fridge housed in the surgery in which she works and handed it to an independent investigator assisting in investigating cases relating to injury sustained as a result of injections given as part of the roll out.
Further vials have since been obtained which cover the three main manufacturers in the UK: Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca.

The contents of the injection vials have been forensically examined and a laboratory report is attached to this brief. A summary of the findings are found below.
A brief summary of a toxicology report is also found below, the full document is attached. A full peer reviewed scientific paper is expected to be provided in due course.
As soon as we had the confirmation of the laboratory report and toxicology. Ian Clayton contacted the Police (details) in line with duty of care to the Public to request immediate cessation of the experimental treatment roll-out and to make an appointment to present this evidence in person to the Police.

Laboratory Report Summary
A summary of the findings detailed in the attached quality assured report is as follows: RAMAN Spectroscopy discovered the following particles -
●   Graphene
●   SP3 Carbon
●   Iron Oxide
●   Carbon derivatives

Toxicology Report Summary
A summary of the findings detailed in the attached toxicology report is as follows:
●   Graphene nanomaterials (GFNs) can penetrate the body’s natural barriers and damage the central nervous system
●   Graphene oxide (GO):
a.  can damage internal organs
b.  damages the reproduction and development system
c.   destroys blood health
d.  damages and destroys cells
e.  can trigger cancer and accelerate ageing
f.   damages mitochondria and DNA
g.  triggers an inflammatory response and three different kinds of cell death
h.  causes changes in gene function